I was already familiar with the Templars and the concept of Jesus Christ marrying Mary Magdalene so I was no longer surprise when I read the Da Vinci Code. It is a mystery novel that successfully mixed fact with fiction that, soon, it became a bestselling novel. It was a much talked about novel but encountered little or no controversy at all. It was so successful that it was soon adapted as a film feature.
I understood the furor and criticisms that the movie encountered before, during and after its showing. While the book did not cause much stir in the literary word, it being preceded by numerous books about the Templars and the Jesus/Mary Magdalene alleged union, it was expected that the readers will not take a fiction as the bible truth. It may spur some curious research for verification as I did, but it was expected that most readers will be able to separate fact from fiction. But movies are different. Since they are made to be easily understood, some of those shown are being or might be accepted as true accounts, hence, the movie was heavily criticized by the Vatican. It did not help that the movie, which attack the very core of our Christian belief cannot and will not be able to tell the story of our faith in two hours, did nothing to say that it was just a work of fiction.
Now on with Angel and Demons. Angels and Demons is actually a prequel of Da Vinci Code. Angel and Demons is actually a better mystery novel. It was fast-paced and chilling that you wish you can read fast enough so you'd know how the story ends. Unfortunately, the movie failed to captured this ambience. The movie was slow and failed to capture the intensity and the suspenseful nature of the novel. It was so boring you'd wished they had all four cardinals dead in a matter of minutes and all the polices fired for they ineptitude and allowing a foreigner to run their investigation.
Angel and Demons is your usual who-done-it suspense thriller with the Vatican as the background. It failed to keep me sitting on the edge of my seat as I could not feel the danger that will keep me glued to the screen. I could not symphatize with the victim so there was not the excitement or the adrenalin rush that I felt while watching Da Vinci Code. One reason why the movie failed miserably was that it was not able to establish clearly the relationship of the Papacy to the Carmelengo which is the key element of the story. Had that been made clear, then people will be in for a big surprise.
Another reason why the movie sucks big time is the wrong choice of actor who played the Carmelengo. The reason that we all became enamored with the Da Vinci movie even if most of the viewers already knew what will happen, is that Sir Ian Mckellen, the actor who was the main villain in the movie (he was also the kontra-bulate in X-Men movies)was able to convince us that he was your BFF. A person na pwede mong pagsabihan ng iyong sekwet na nakakasigurado kang walang leakage kasi nga BFF. At kahit na me leakage, hindi mo siya pagdududahan. Ganyan kagaling si Sir Mckellen, nabola niya ang lahat na hindi siya ang kontra-bulate until a last minute stupidity got him in. Which was lacking in the actor who portrayed the Carmelengo. He lacked the charm, the innocence that would make us believe that he was incapable of killing the Pope. He was very explicit with his action, lacking the subtlety that is important to all those successful kontra-bulate. He was flat. He lacks the duality that would make his portrayal of an innocent man gone power hungry convincing.
So what made me stay for a little bit longer? ROME. Magnifico, its ancient facade a story itself. The place was so beautifully captured in the film it made we want to try and torture myself again with long flights so I can visit this place. No wonder the place is called the ETERNAL CITY.
But Eternal City aside, I can no longer keep the boredom and the misery from setting in. I was miserable thinking of the chances I took while I was stealing coins from Panget's purse. Paano kung nahuli ako, mababatukan ako just because of a boring movie? Hmm, simply not worth it. And with my eyes begging for a sound sleep, I hurriedly left the movie right into the second murdered cardinal.
Well, it was wise of the Vatican to keep their mouth shut this time. The movie simply simply ain't worth the trouble. Buti na lang nakita ko yung barkada kong nagtatarbaho sa SM, pinanood ko ulit ang Ded na si Lolo, buhay na ulit ang dugo ko.....
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
well well well.. buti na lang nakadaan ako d2 at nabasa ko ang review nyo sa angels and demons mang totoy..at least hindi mauulit ung dismaya ko tulad sa davinci...i have (& read) both books..kaya nga sabi ko sa ibang frenships ko,sana lang di maulit sa D&A ang nangyari sa davinci..kaso ganun pa din pala...mas nagustuhan ko ang story ng D&A(sa book) dahil hindi nila inatake ang religion altho un namang mga leaders ng relihiyon ang binanatan nila dun..hahaha..walang lusot!( i wonder kung jew si DB or an atheist--*esep esep*)..
ReplyDeleteDan Brown shud have chosen the better actors na gaganap sa story nya...i like tom hanks,but i dont think the role of robert langdon fits him...(kaso wala din akong maisip na magfi fit sa title role..hayss)
thank u po uli sa review..at least di na ko magsasayang ng pera na pambili ng dvd..*grin*
tagal ko ding di nakadalaw..sensya na po at parolado pa rin ako..kaya singit singit lang ako..di pa pwede ang kili kili...hihihihi...
*jas*
di ko naintindihan po....ingles eh!!!
ReplyDeleteHoy Mae Hilig, bakit ganun ba, me time na nawawalan ako ng hininga? Di ko matanong tong si Panget kasi baka kung ano na namang sermon ang marinig ko.....
ReplyDeleteMinsan, for no reason, hihingalin na lang ako bigla. Ayoko sana mag-oxygen kasi sabi ko sa doktor bakit yung tatay ko, emphysima, kaya niya wala oxygen. Sabi naman nitong si Panget, iba daw ang lungs at ang puso. Kasi nga na-enlarge daw ang puso ko sa sborang lunod sa tubig, e di ko naman maramdamang lumaki ang puso ko. Ganun pa rin, masama pa rin naman ang ugali ko e di ba kung lumaki yun, di sana mas mabait na ako...
On the other hand, pag nalulunod pala ang isang bagay, lumalaki, hmmmmm, lunurin ko kaya yung senyorita ko
jas, yung sa akin naman e sa akin lang baka malay mo iba naman ang pananaw mo sa pelikula kasi yung iba naman ay nag-enjoy din. Pero agree ako sa iyo that Tom Hanks was a miscast, parang I was imagine Robert Langdon as someone who is in his middle age, medyo slim and lithe, medyo grayish hair.... Someone with a scholarly looks but still have that funny bone that anyone can tickle. A younger Gregory Peck or even better wala kasing star power, yung asawa ni Bb. Streep forgot the tile, yung nag shoot sila sa rapids tapos naisakay nila mga kriminal pala
ReplyDeletemanong the character actor ur referring to is david strathairn from the movie "the river wild" i have seen him already cuz his wife is our former chief nurse Logan Goodman (a very, very pretty stunning lady) yung mukha nya ang makikita mo sa logo ng hospital dati pag sine-search mo sa computer yung hospital namin. Both well known doctors here kc ang mga magulang nila. They were both born here pero lumipat na sila sa NY. Wala lang...
ReplyDeletematigas din kc ang ulo mo po...u want a one day miracle which is cannot be naman. Compliance in all ur medications and strictly adhere to healthy lifestyle with regards to food and proper rest ang kailangan mo. Sa loob ko na ipapaliwanag sa u manong kaya lang baka bukas na, 9:30 na eh...un barakuda inoorasan ako, naiinggit ako sa ginagawa ko noon, wan tu sawa lang noon pero ngayon...ewan
ReplyDeletere: comment posted at 9:14 PM...
ReplyDeleteanong "wala lang", ka importanteng
information ang binigay mo pagkatapos,
wala lang?
o sige na nga po...."meron lang" erase na un "wala lang"
ReplyDeletesi david strathairn...sya yung actor sa "the uninvited" na kelan lang pinalabas february ata
kung mejo bata bata pa si al pacino or robert deniro,pwede ding si robert redford,they can fit the role of robert langdon...kaso wala ng actors ngayon ang may ganung qualities that they (AP,RD,RR) possessed..karamihan kasi ng mga actors ngayon,patweetums na or papogian ang dating...
ReplyDeletesabihin ko sana brad pitt,kaso magiging bias ako dahil peborit ko sya...hahaha...
may isa akong nasa isip,di naman sya masyadong sikat--william fitchner of prison break...he's one hell of an actor as a detective sa prison break 2...kering keri nya ung pagiging detective..wala nga lang break sa big screen..(or maybe may movies sya na di ko lang napanood or di ko sya napansin..hehehe)
sir w...ung mga nakabasa ng libro,siguradong disappointed sa outcome ng movie..iba kasi ung nabasa,sa napanood..mahirap kasing ilagay lahat sa film ang bawat details ng story sa libro...laking gastos nun...hhihi...sa libro kasi,u can read what's in the mind of the characters,unlike sa movies....unless lalagyan nila ng mga captions with matching clouds habang nag iisip ang actors...hahahaha
nakows jas, sobrang guilty na nga ako sa review na yan, pinost ko pa sa pep, di ko napansin yung review ni maka_bansa, baka sabihin niya, kinontra-bulate ko na naman siya.... yan pa namang angels and demons mas nagustuhan ko kesa sa da vinci kasi yung da vinci bago ko pa nabasa, nabasa ko na yung mga last templars etc.... so parang hindi na newbie... on the other hand, nagulantang ako na pari ang killer sa demons...
ReplyDeletebasta in my POV sa review na yan....best actress para sakin si marya sa Mother Nanny ahihihihi!!!
ReplyDelete